4.5 Graphing Functions

Coming Concepts

  • •

    Analyze a function and its derivatives to draw its graph.

We now have enough analytical tools to draw graphs of a wide variety of algebraic and transcendental functions. Before showing how to graph specific functions, let’s look at a general strategy to use when graphing any function.

Problem Solving Strategy (Drawing the Graph of a Function).

Given a function f, use the following steps to sketch a graph of f:

  1. (a)

    Determine the domain of the function.

  2. (b)

    Locate the x- and y-intercepts.

  3. (c)

    Evaluate limx→∞f⁢(x) and limx→−∞f⁢(x) to determine the end behavior. If either of these limits is a finite number L, then y=L is a horizontal asymptote. If either of these limits is ∞ or −∞, determine whether f has an oblique asymptote. If f is a rational function such that f⁢(x)=p⁢(x)q⁢(x), where the degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator, then f can be written as

    f⁢(x)=p⁢(x)q⁢(x)=g⁢(x)+r⁢(x)q⁢(x),

    where the degree of r⁢(x) is less than the degree of q⁢(x). The values of f⁢(x) approach the values of g⁢(x) as x→±∞. If g⁢(x) is a linear function, it is known as an oblique asymptote.

  4. (d)

    Determine whether f has any vertical asymptotes.

  5. (e)

    Calculate f′. Find all critical points and determine the intervals where f is increasing and where f is decreasing. Determine whether f has any local extrema.

  6. (f)

    Calculate f′′. Determine the intervals where f is concave up and where f is concave down. Use this information to determine whether f has any inflection points. The second derivative can also be used as an alternate means to determine or verify that f has a local extremum at a critical point.

Now let’s use this strategy to graph several different functions. We start by graphing a polynomial function.

Example 4.5.1 (Sketching a Graph of a Polynomial).


Sketch a graph of f⁢(x)=(x−1)2⁢(x+2).

Solution: Step 1. Since f is a polynomial, the domain is the set of all real numbers.

Step 2. When x=0,f⁢(x)=2. Therefore, the y-intercept is (0,2). To find the x-intercepts, we need to solve the equation (x−1)2⁢(x+2)=0, gives us the x-intercepts (1,0) and (−2,0)

Step 3. We need to evaluate the end behavior of f. As x→∞, (x−1)2→∞ and (x+2)→∞. Therefore, limx→∞f⁢(x)=∞. As x→−∞, (x−1)2→∞ and (x+2)→−∞. Therefore, limx→−∞f⁢(x)=−∞. To get even more information about the end behavior of f, we can multiply the factors of f. When doing so, we see that

f⁢(x)=(x−1)2⁢(x+2)=x3−3⁢x+2.

Since the leading term of f is x3, we conclude that f behaves like y=x3 as x→±∞.

Step 4. Since f is a polynomial function, it does not have any vertical asymptotes.

Step 5. The first derivative of f is

f′⁢(x)=3⁢x2−3.

Therefore, f has two critical points: x=1,−1. Divide the interval (−∞,∞) into the three smaller intervals: (−∞,−1), (−1,1), and (1,∞). Then, choose test points x=−2, x=0, and x=2 from these intervals and evaluate the sign of f′⁢(x) at each of these test points. It’s easiest to do this by factoring f′⁢(x) as f′⁢(x)=3⁢(x−1)⁢(x+1).

Table 4.14:
IntervalTest PointSign of Derivative ⁢3⁢(x−1)⁢(x+1)Conclusion(−∞,−1)x=−2(+)⁢(−)⁢(−)=+f⁢ is increasing.(−1,1)x=0(+)⁢(−)⁢(+)=−f⁢ is decreasing.(1,∞)x=2(+)⁢(+)⁢(+)=+f⁢ is increasing.

From the table, we see that f has a local maximum at x=−1 and a local minimum at x=1. Evaluating f⁢(x) at those two points, we find that the local maximum value is f⁢(−1)=4 and the local minimum value is f⁢(1)=0.

Step 6. The second derivative of f is

f′′⁢(x)=6⁢x.

The second derivative is zero at x=0. Therefore, to determine the concavity of f, divide the interval (−∞,∞) into the smaller intervals (−∞,0) and (0,∞), and choose test points x=−1 and x=1 to determine the concavity of f on each of these smaller intervals as shown in the following table.

Table 4.15:
IntervalTest PointSign of ⁢f′′⁢(x)=6⁢xConclusion(−∞,0)x=−1−f⁢ is concave down.(0,∞)x=1+f⁢ is concave up.

We note that the information in the preceding table confirms the fact, found in step 5, that f has a local maximum at x=−1 and a local minimum at x=1. In addition, the information found in step 5—namely, f has a local maximum at x=−1 and a local minimum at x=1, and f′⁢(x)=0 at those points—combined with the fact that f′′ changes sign only at x=0 confirms the results found in step 6 on the concavity of f.

Combining this information, we arrive at the graph of f⁢(x)=(x−1)2⁢(x+2) shown in the following graph.

−3−2−1123−101020f⁢(x)=(x−1)2⁢(x+2)
Figure 4.35:
Checkpoint 4.5.1.

Sketch a graph of f⁢(x)=(x−1)3⁢(x+2).

Hint: f is a fourth-degree polynomial.

Example 4.5.2 (Sketching a Rational Function).


Sketch the graph of f⁢(x)=x2(1−x2).

Solution: Step 1. The function f is defined as long as the denominator is not zero. Therefore, the domain is the set of all real numbers x except x=±1.

Step 2. Find the intercepts. If x=0, then f⁢(x)=0, so 0 is an intercept. If y=0, then x2(1−x2)=0, which implies x=0. Therefore, (0,0) is the only intercept.

Step 3. Evaluate the limits at infinity. Since f is a rational function, divide the numerator and denominator by the highest power in the denominator: x2. We obtain

limx→±∞x21−x2=limx→±∞11x2−1=−1.

Therefore, f has a horizontal asymptote of y=−1 as x→∞ and x→−∞.

Step 4. To determine whether f has any vertical asymptotes, first check to see whether the denominator has any zeroes. We find the denominator is zero when x=±1. To determine whether the lines x=1 or x=−1 are vertical asymptotes of f, evaluate limx→1f⁢(x) and limx→−1f⁢(x). By looking at each one-sided limit as x→1, we see that

limx→1+x21−x2=−∞andlimx→1−x21−x2=∞.

In addition, by looking at each one-sided limit as x→−1, we find that

limx→−1+x21−x2=∞andlimx→−1−x21−x2=−∞.

Step 5. Calculate the first derivative:

f′⁢(x)=(1−x2)⁢(2⁢x)−x2⁢(−2⁢x)(1−x2)2=2⁢x(1−x2)2.

Critical points occur at points x where f′⁢(x)=0 or f′⁢(x) is undefined. We see that f′⁢(x)=0 when x=0. The derivative f′ is not undefined at any point in the domain of f. However, x=±1 are not in the domain of f. Therefore, to determine where f is increasing and where f is decreasing, divide the interval (−∞,∞) into four smaller intervals: (−∞,−1), (−1,0), (0,1), and (1,∞), and choose a test point in each interval to determine the sign of f′⁢(x) in each of these intervals. The values x=−2, x=−12, x=12, and x=2 are good choices for test points as shown in the following table.

Table 4.16:
IntervalTest PointSign of ⁢f′⁢(x)=2⁢x(1−x2)2Conclusion(−∞,−1)x=−2−⁣/⁣+⁣=⁣−f⁢ is decreasing.(−1,0)x=−1/2−⁣/⁣+⁣=⁣−f⁢ is decreasing.(0,1)x=1/2+⁣/⁣+⁣=⁣+f⁢ is increasing.(1,∞)x=2+⁣/⁣+⁣=⁣+f⁢ is increasing.

From this analysis, we conclude that f has a local minimum at x=0 but no local maximum.

Step 6. Calculate the second derivative:

f′′⁢(x) =(1−x2)2⁢(2)−2⁢x⁢(2⁢(1−x2)⁢(−2⁢x))(1−x2)4
=(1−x2)⁢[2⁢(1−x2)+8⁢x2](1−x2)4
=2⁢(1−x2)+8⁢x2(1−x2)3
=6⁢x2+2(1−x2)3.

To determine the intervals where f is concave up and where f is concave down, we first need to find all points x where f′′⁢(x)=0 or f′′⁢(x) is undefined. Since the numerator 6⁢x2+2≠0 for any x, f′′⁢(x) is never zero. Furthermore, f′′ is not undefined for any x in the domain of f. However, as discussed earlier, x=±1 are not in the domain of f. Therefore, to determine the concavity of f, we divide the interval (−∞,∞) into the three smaller intervals (−∞,−1), (−1,−1), and (1,∞), and choose a test point in each of these intervals to evaluate the sign of f′′⁢(x). in each of these intervals. The values x=−2, x=0, and x=2 are possible test points as shown in the following table.

Table 4.17:
IntervalTest PointSign of ⁢f′′⁢(x)=6⁢x2+2(1−x2)3Conclusion(−∞,−1)x=−2+⁣/⁣−⁣=⁣−f⁢ is concave down.(−1,−1)x=0+⁣/⁣+⁣=⁣+f⁢ is concave up.(1,∞)x=2+⁣/⁣−⁣=⁣−f⁢ is concave down.

Combining all this information, we arrive at the graph of f shown below. Note that, although f changes concavity at x=−1 and x=1, there are no inflection points at either of these places because f is not continuous at x=−1 or x=1.

246−4−224f⁢(x)=x21−x2x=−1x=1y=−1
Figure 4.36:
Checkpoint 4.5.2.

Sketch a graph of f⁢(x)=(3⁢x+5)(4⁢x+8).

Hint: A line y=L is a horizontal asymptote of f if the limit as x→∞ or the limit as x→−∞ of f⁢(x) is L. A line x=a is a vertical asymptote if at least one of the one-sided limits of f as x→a is ∞ or −∞.

Example 4.5.3 (Sketching a Rational Function with an Oblique Asymptote).


Sketch the graph of f⁢(x)=x2(x−1)

Solution: Step 1. The domain of f is the set of all real numbers x except x=1.

Step 2. Find the intercepts. We can see that when x=0, f⁢(x)=0, so (0,0) is the only intercept.

Step 3. Evaluate the limits at infinity. Since the degree of the numerator is one more than the degree of the denominator, f must have an oblique asymptote. To find the oblique asymptote, use long division of polynomials to write

f⁢(x)=x2x−1=x+1+1x−1.

Since 1/(x−1)→0 as x→±∞, f⁢(x) approaches the line y=x+1 as x→±∞. The line y=x+1 is an oblique asymptote for f.

Step 4. To check for vertical asymptotes, look at where the denominator is zero. Here the denominator is zero at x=1. Looking at both one-sided limits as x→1, we find

limx→1+x2x−1=∞andlimx→1−x2x−1=−∞.

Therefore, x=1 is a vertical asymptote, and we have determined the behavior of f as x approaches 1 from the right and the left.

Step 5. Calculate the first derivative:

f′⁢(x)=(x−1)⁢(2⁢x)−x2⁢(1)(x−1)2=x2−2⁢x(x−1)2.

We have f′⁢(x)=0 when x2−2⁢x=x⁢(x−2)=0. Therefore, x=0 and x=2 are critical points. Since f is undefined at x=1, we need to divide the interval (−∞,∞) into the smaller intervals (−∞,0), (0,1), (1,2), and (2,∞), and choose a test point from each interval to evaluate the sign of f′⁢(x) in each of these smaller intervals. For example, let x=−1, x=12, x=32, and x=3 be the test points as shown in the following table.

Table 4.18:
IntervalTest PointSign of ⁢f′⁢(x)=x2−2⁢x(x−1)2=x⁢(x−2)(x−1)2Conclusion(−∞,0)x=−1(−)(−)/+=+f⁢ is increasing.(0,1)x=1/2(+)(−)/+=−f⁢ is decreasing.(1,2)x=3/2(+)(−)/+=−f⁢ is decreasing.(2,∞)x=3(+)(+)/+=+f⁢ is increasing.

From this table, we see that f has a local maximum at x=0 and a local minimum at x=2. The value of f at the local maximum is f⁢(0)=0 and the value of f at the local minimum is f⁢(2)=4. Therefore, (0,0) and (2,4) are important points on the graph.

Step 6. Calculate the second derivative:

f′′⁢(x) =(x−1)2⁢(2⁢x−2)−(x2−2⁢x)⁢(2⁢(x−1))(x−1)4
=(x−1)⁢[(x−1)⁢(2⁢x−2)−2⁢(x2−2⁢x)](x−1)4
=(x−1)⁢(2⁢x−2)−2⁢(x2−2⁢x)(x−1)3
=2⁢x2−4⁢x+2−(2⁢x2−4⁢x)(x−1)3
=2(x−1)3.

We see that f′′⁢(x) is never zero or undefined for x in the domain of f. Since f is undefined at x=1, to check concavity we just divide the interval (−∞,∞) into the two smaller intervals (−∞,1) and (1,∞), and choose a test point from each interval to evaluate the sign of f′′⁢(x) in each of these intervals. The values x=0 and x=2 are possible test points as shown in the following table.

Table 4.19:
IntervalTest PointSign of ⁢f′′⁢(x)=2(x−1)3Conclusion(−∞,1)x=0+⁣/⁣−⁣=⁣−f⁢ is concave down.(1,∞)x=2+⁣/⁣+⁣=⁣+f⁢ is concave up.

From the information gathered, we arrive at the following graph for f.

−6−4−2246−55f⁢(x)=x2x−1x=1y=x+1
Figure 4.37:
Checkpoint 4.5.3.

Find the oblique asymptote for f⁢(x)=(3⁢x3−2⁢x+1)(2⁢x2−4).

Hint: Use long division of polynomials.

Example 4.5.4 (Sketching the Graph of a Function with a Cusp).


Sketch a graph of f⁢(x)=(x−1)2/3.

Solution: Step 1. Since the cube-root function is defined for all real numbers x and (x−1)2/3=(x−13)2, the domain of f is all real numbers.

Step 2: To find the y-intercept, evaluate f⁢(0). Since f⁢(0)=1, the y-intercept is (0,1). To find the x-intercept, solve (x−1)2/3=0. The solution of this equation is x=1, so the x-intercept is (1,0).

Step 3: Since limx→±∞(x−1)2/3=∞, the function continues to grow without bound as x→∞ and x→−∞.

Step 4: The function has no vertical asymptotes.

Step 5: To determine where f is increasing or decreasing, calculate f′. We find

f′⁢(x)=23⁢(x−1)−1/3=23⁢(x−1)1/3.

This function is not zero anywhere, but it is undefined when x=1. Therefore, the only critical point is x=1. Divide the interval (−∞,∞) into the smaller intervals (−∞,1) and (1,∞), and choose test points in each of these intervals to determine the sign of f′⁢(x) in each of these smaller intervals. Let x=0 and x=2 be the test points as shown in the following table.

Table 4.20:
IntervalTest PointSign of ⁢f′⁢(x)=23⁢(x−1)1/3Conclusion(−∞,1)x=0+⁣/⁣−⁣=⁣−f⁢ is decreasing.(1,∞)x=2+⁣/⁣+⁣=⁣+f⁢ is increasing.

We conclude that f has a local minimum at x=1. Evaluating f at x=1, we find that the value of f at the local minimum is zero. Note that f′⁢(1) is undefined, so to determine the behavior of the function at this critical point, we need to examine limx→1f′⁢(x). Looking at the one-sided limits, we have

limx→1+23⁢(x−1)1/3=∞andlimx→1−23⁢(x−1)1/3=−∞.

Therefore, f has a cusp at x=1.

Step 6: To determine concavity, we calculate the second derivative of f:

f′′⁢(x)=−29⁢(x−1)−4/3=−29⁢(x−1)4/3.

We find that f′′⁢(x) is defined for all x, but is undefined when x=1. Therefore, divide the interval (−∞,∞) into the smaller intervals (−∞,1) and (1,∞), and choose test points to evaluate the sign of f′′⁢(x) in each of these intervals. As we did earlier, let x=0 and x=2 be test points as shown in the following table.

Table 4.21:
IntervalTest PointSign of ⁢f′′⁢(x)=−29⁢(x−1)4/3Conclusion(−∞,1)x=0−⁣/⁣+⁣=⁣−f⁢ is concave down.(1,∞)x=2−⁣/⁣+⁣=⁣−f⁢ is concave down.

From this table, we conclude that f is concave down everywhere. Combining all of this information, we arrive at the following graph for f.

−6−4−224682468f⁢(x)=(x−1)2/3
Figure 4.38:
Checkpoint 4.5.4.

Consider the function f⁢(x)=5−x2/3. Determine the point on the graph where a cusp is located. Determine the end behavior of f.

Hint: A function f has a cusp at a point a if f⁢(a) exists, f′⁢(a) is undefined, one of the one-sided limits as x→a of f′⁢(x) is +∞, and the other one-sided limit is −∞.

Key Concepts

  • •

    For a polynomial function p⁢(x)=an⁢xn+an−1⁢xn−1+…+a1⁢x+a0, where an≠0, the end behavior is determined by the leading term an⁢xn. If n≠0, p⁢(x) approaches ∞ or −∞ at each end.

  • •

    For a rational function f⁢(x)=p⁢(x)q⁢(x), the end behavior is determined by the relationship between the degree of p and the degree of q. If the degree of p is less than the degree of q, the line y=0 is a horizontal asymptote for f. If the degree of p is equal to the degree of q, then the line y=anbn is a horizontal asymptote, where an and bn are the leading coefficients of p and q, respectively. If the degree of p is greater than the degree of q, then f approaches ∞ or −∞ at each end.